USE CASES· 08 mandates, one protocol
Different mandates. The same line.
Judgment creditors, receivers, compliance teams, issuers, and government recover differently. Here is how the protocol runs each one.
Judgment Recovery
You hold a judgment. The debtor moved the money.
Freeze, garnishment, and turnover instruments tied directly to traced assets and the controlling order.
View use case →
Crypto Fraud Tracing
Funds went on-chain. You need attribution linked to identity.
Endpoints resolved to identified entities and the custodians that hold the funds.
View use case →
Receiver Operations
You are court-appointed. Every action must be authorized and accounted for.
No action executes outside the scope the appointing order grants.
View use case →
Crypto Exchange SAR Support
Your exchange's compliance desk needs a provable trail behind every SAR.
Transactions and counterparties linked, timestamped, and source-attached.
View use case →
Stablecoin Recovery
Tainted tokens on-chain. You need a freeze, burn, and reissue.
Proof of taint and a documented destination wallet for issuer review.
View use case →
Exchange Enforcement
Assets sitting at an exchange. You need process served and funds turned over.
Freeze, intercept, or turnover generated for the specific exchange and authority.
View use case →
Multi-Claimant Waterfall
Many victims, one debtor. You need pro-rata distribution with a transparent, reproducible calculation.
A distribution that balances exactly against the recovered pool.
View use case →
OFAC / Sanctions Clearance
Your recovery target may be sanctioned. Clear the gate before you act.
Enforcement against a flagged party is blocked until cleared.
View use case →