USE CASES· 08 mandates, one protocol
Different mandates. The same line.
Judgment creditors, receivers, compliance teams, issuers, and government recover differently. Every case still enters at intake and exits at audited resolution. Here is how the protocol runs each one.
Judgment Recovery
You hold a judgment. The debtor moved the money.
Freeze, garnishment, and turnover instruments tied directly to traced assets and the controlling order.
View use case →
Crypto Fraud Tracing
Funds went on-chain. You need attribution linked to identity.
Endpoints resolved to real-world entities and the custodians that hold the funds.
View use case →
Receiver Operations
You are court-appointed. Every action must be authorized and accounted for.
No action executes outside the scope the appointing order grants.
View use case →
Compliance & SAR Support
Your compliance team needs a provable trail for a suspicious activity report.
Transactions and counterparties linked, timestamped, and source-attached.
View use case →
Stablecoin Recovery
Tainted tokens on-chain. You need a freeze, burn, and reissue.
Proof of taint and a certified destination the issuer can act on without carrying the risk.
View use case →
Exchange Enforcement
Assets sitting at an exchange. You need process served and funds turned over.
Freeze, intercept, or turnover generated for the specific exchange and authority.
View use case →
Multi-Claimant Waterfall
Many victims, one debtor. You need pro-rata distribution the court will approve.
A distribution that balances exactly against the recovered pool.
View use case →
OFAC / Sanctions Clearance
Your recovery target may be sanctioned. Clear the gate before you act.
Enforcement against a flagged party is blocked until cleared.
View use case →